Summarizing: What YOU Felt About The Recent Ashton/ Oprah/ CNN Hype

* Thanks all for the 200 incredibly thoughtful/funny/candid responses. You folks never fail to surprise us (in an excellent way. Hope everyone enjoys this wide range of comments that only MrTweet readers (i.e. YOU) can come out with!

We asked the question last Sunday – “What did YOU feel about the Ashton/Oprah/CNN hype?”. Responses flooded in – we received 107 in the first hour alone, and almost 200 in total. We carefully read through all of them to understand how our readers (which represented a very broad cross-section of the Twitter user base) felt about the intense coverage that was happening both in the media and within Twitter.

Ego Stroking Contest
While the responses spanned across negative to positive, the predominant sentiment seems to be that it was one big ego-stroking contest. Debra called it a “race for number of followers“. Susannah went one step further, commenting that they felt that the common Twitterers were degraded, and treated as “all little knick knacks being set up on a tacky, mirrored shelf in some celebs bathroom“. Gail takes the cake for extreme creativity in this category, calling the celebs “self absorbed bloated ticks living off their brain dead fans“. Furthermore, as Gráinne (and others) noted, they “never said anything huge interesting anyway“.

Awareness for Important Issues
It was certainly not all negative though, with quite a few readers mentioning the positive impact of this intense media coverage shed light on issues they did not know about. Hopeful shared that she “learned about so many new things, including the Malaria No More Cause from Ashton and Demi” and Morgen learned about “modern day slavery” from Demi as well.

Why should Charity be Conditional?
But even the charitable aspects of this did not escape the skeptical gaze of several commenters. LadyHawke called it “Total self absorption disguised in altruism“, while Kaa wondered out loud on why it has to be conditional if they really cared about charity, and Samantha is irritated that celebs tend to broadcast their “good deeds” all over the place.

Ashton Killed The Whale
Another group of comments centered around what these intense mainstream coverage would do to Twitter. Again, it was predominantly negative, with users complaining about the strain it was placing on the Twitter servers. Dee noted that there has been nothing but problems since this past Friday from the mikey worm, copycats to fail whales, delays in tweets and lost tweets. LuckyMizM had a sharp observation – Ashton said during his campaign that he thought someone was hacking his account because his tweets weren’t showing up. Turns out that the reason was because Twitter was overcapacity (probably with folks trying to help him win)

Massive Influx of New Peeps
Other users also feared that this coverage damaged the core service by bringing in lots of people who do not understand Twitter. Dani felt that it “just created an influx of idiots on Twitter and TONS of spammers“, while Lakerin also observed that he had lots of “new commercial followers that are clumsily hawking their wares“. On a more personal level, Darren worried that Twitter was being overtaken by the mainstream, and hence becoming unpopular to early adopter geek types like himself.

Ending On A Nice Note…
Lots of negativity no doubt, but we at MrTweet (being the nice friendly people we are) wants to end this note by highlighting a few more lighthearted and positive comments. Lori notes that celebrities are just having fun like the rest of us, and they should not be condemned because of that. Our final highlight comes from Aaron, who seem delighted that Twitter is getting all this press because his circle of contacts is finally getting round to using Twitter!

All right, it took us a while to read through and digest 200 comments, and we hope you enjoyed this summary of what people like YOU felt over this incident. Sorry to those we did not manage to highlight – but keep the comments rolling in!

Category: Unique Insights View Comments

  • ABEL409699430

    You got a nice blog up there.

    Thanks
    james
    ______________________________________________
    pass hair drug test | ways to pass saliva drug test | beat drug test

  • ABEL409699430

    i added this to my collge report

    Have a nice day
    smith
    ______________________________________________
    pass a drug test | pass marijuana drug test | pass marijuana drug test

  • ABEL409699430

    You got a nice blog up there.

    Have a nice day
    james kails
    ______________________________________________
    hockey knockouts | stop snoring solution | toronto furnished apartments

  • Ok, I'm sorry. I must have been lost in space the past week or so because I did not hear about this. Ashton and Ophra had some type of competition? On Twitter? Was it who could get more followers?
    Thanks! :)

  • Andy

    What I thought was the funnies part of this whole thing was Oprah getting involved at the last second and dropping 200K on "nets". On her show she says, I just committed to 20K nets, how much is that? 200K, Ok. Gail in the background, that's OK, That's good, 200K, sure why not? Which basically made Ashton's generous hard work and effort to promote his cause/himself to Oprah spit out 200K like it was pocket change and Oprah swoops in and 2x him. Great stuff, good comedy, definitely ego driven, but for a good cause.

  • Maya

    I absolutely agree with those who see celebrities "very shallow" contest as a negative to Twitter. T, has established its own very "environment" and was getting better in quality. Such an "amusing" news "what one had for dinner" were disappearing and lost of comments of good quality are appearing.
    I've never been one to follow any celebrity. I do not have to "live' life of others, I've lots of interests and my life is full. I just checked briefly few comments for their quality not to show bad judgment about anyone and wasn't surprised. What O. does every minute of the day and how show shall go, really doesn't interest me. However some tweets of average members are witty, sensible and bring sincerely shared knowledge, advice, fun and more. Without trying for worthless victory above others. It is friendly environment and should stay that way.

  • This raises two big questions for me. Is this a poor representation of our apathetic society that we would rather support pop culture over news media? OR Is this a great example of the deterioration of News Media, that there is a lack of support from an apathetic generation. In both circumstances there is a MAJOR dilemma. Though the support that Ashton offered bed netting to fight malaria was well deserving of applause... I believe media is mainly at fault. In this "which came first" scenario between apathy and over exposure of pop media and lack of exposure of REAL news, fingers should be pointed at news media. If we kept people current and energized about what is really important in our world, "news" would not be dying out (soon to be a legend like the unicorn) and the youth would be a great deal less apathetic. But that's just me.

  • bloodarrow

    I was starting to wonder if i was the only person who noticed how celebs are using twitter, the uneducated and possibly brain dead followers to self promote. I guess ashton just showed to everybody what a buch of lambs people can be, although i doubt he even noticed as he is an idiot himself. Just shows why Sir Stephen Fry is so popular, the contrast between his tweets and ashton are evident, but to now to have Oprah in the mix, is just ridiculous...

  • I realize everyone has a different idea what Twitter should be for its users, however, I think the publicity has been a shot in the arm for Twitter. Almost everyone I know is checking it out--and we a hearing snips about things we may not have heard about before. As far as the celebrity thing goes--I am not the star struck type, but it's kind of cool to see that celebs are people too, just like we are--and I am sure it is kind of fun for them to communicate on their terms--if they use their 140 words as a bandwagon--so be it....

  • pam munro

    Ashton who?

  • I agree with the comment that celebrities flaunt their charity work way too much. Is it really a big deal to buy 10,000 or more mosquito nets when you have more money that you know what to do with? True philanthropists give without needing so much attention and applause in return, they give because it's the right thing to do, and because they can. All these celebs are out there pimping themselves using the latest publicity generator - charity work. While I'm happy about any giving to charity, it doesn't make these rich kids Mother Teresa - it's just another self-promotion tactic like appearing on talk-shows and tv interviews. I'm glad Twitter's getting some respect, but I'm not that excited about an influx of Ashton-loving celebrity worshippers. That's personally not who I joined up to meet.

  • tommytrc

    I feel more then anything this shows how far CNN has fallen from grace. What once was a huge news organization can how be beaten by a half-assed Hollywood prankster. This was a huge joke and the egg is clearly on CNN. They had at least 2 channels worth of airtime going out to hundreds of thousands if not millions of watchers and they still could not drum up enough tweets to beat him. Pathetic. CNN's relevance is in the tank.

  • I don't think it means CNN's relevance is in the tank. I think that maybe it shows how much of a technological lag their audience might have. Ashton has more of a teen/youth fanbase, which may be more likely and quicker to hop on Twitter than CNN's audience of stock brokers and wall street journalists.

    Don't rule out the audience in this case, but you do have a valid point. Appreciate your comment!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Back to top